Friday, October 28, 2011
When She Awoke by Hillary Jordan
Is it my imagination, or are books just getting better and better? The wow factor is being ramped up. When She Awoke by Hillary Jordan certainly is a prime example of Donald Maas's Putting the Fire in Fiction. It's fiery red!
Just released on October 4th of this year, When She Awoke is a modern interpretation of Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. When Hannah Payne wakes up only to discover that she's been "chromed" in red, her entire epidermis dyed scarlet, she must exist in society with this demarcation of a murderer. Criminals in this futuristic world come in varying colors, each hue to denote their crime.
From Amazon....
...she finds herself lying on a table in a bare room, covered only by a paper gown, with cameras broadcasting her every move to millions at home, for whom observing new Chromes--criminals whose skin color has been genetically altered to match the class of their crime--is a sinister form of entertainment. Hannah is a Red for the crime of murder. The victim, says the State of Texas, was her unborn child, and Hannah is determined to protect the identity of the father, a public figure with whom she shared a fierce and forbidden love.
A powerful reimagining of The Scarlet Letter, When She Woke is a timely fable about a stigmatized woman struggling to navigate an America of the not-too-distant future, where the line between church and state has been eradicated, and convicted felons are no longer imprisoned and rehabilitated but chromed and released back into the population to survive as best they can. In seeking a path to safety in an alien and hostile world, Hannah unknowingly embarks on a journey of self-discovery that forces her to question the values she once held true and the righteousness of a country that politicizes faith and love.
Excerpt From When She Woke by Hillary Jordan
Labels:
Book Review,
Books To Read,
Dystopian,
Science Fiction
Bookmark this post:blogger tutorials
Social Bookmarking Blogger Widget |
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
The Dovekeepers by Alice Hoffman
You've seen the bookcover plastered all over the internet, and it's intriguing, but have you really delved into what the book is about. As many of you know, Alice Hoffman, is my favorite contemporary writer, but I'm not just promoting this book here because of a blind devotion. Take a look at the book trailer yourself and decide if this book deserves to be one of the top ten bestsellers for Fall 2011. I certainly think it does and I'm putting it at the top of my To Be Read list.
The Dovekeepers by Alice Hoffman
Bookmark this post:blogger tutorials
Social Bookmarking Blogger Widget |
| Reactions: |
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Book Reviews --Taking it Personally
Recently, a friend and fellow author, Terri Giuliano Long, received a review of her book In Leah's Wake, which set me to pose a question: Should a book reviewer present from their personal outlook on life, or should they refrain from infusing their review with their preconceptions, whether they be religious, political or otherwise?
Terri's recent post, Existentialist Themes in the Novel, In Leah's Wake, written in reaction to the review, states the matter quite clearly. With regard to her creation of In Leah's Wake, "A Catholic, I can no more escape my core beliefs or heritage than a Jewish, Muslim or atheist writer could his or hers."
Novel and author are part and parcel. Creating a novel is, in a sense, an author's platform for expression and thusly reflects their world view. I would argue that reviews are not platforms for reviewers. Scratching your head? Think of it this way. A book is an author's creation, complete with the full freedom of creative license; a review is a report on that author's effort, and while creative license certainly belongs to any writer, of reviews included, the reviewer should use some restraint.
While reviewers are readers too, a reviewer is so much more. A reviewer's role is to inform, not to emote or display their own world view. It is a reviewer's responsibility to provide an objective review, while making only enough of their personality known as to be deemed an opinion. Reactions that spill further become a different animal than "review". In other words, a reviewer should not turn a review into a soapbox for spouting their own belief system, socio-political orientation, personal plight, etc.
Maybe you enjoy hearing a reviewer bash a book, because it's too Republican, for example, or it doesn't sit well with them because it touches on divorce and they have just undergone one themselves. These factors may interest some readers, but because they don't aptly illustrate the author's work or the purpose of the book, do they really belong in a review? I would argue that there's a fine line between a reviewer's personal opinion of a book and their personal views on life. A reviewer should keep their personal viewpoints out of their review. In fact, the guidelines for some reviewer organizations require that the review not include one sentence written in the first person.
Reviewers come from all backgrounds, especially with the advent of the internet. This has opened the door to anyone with access to a keyboard. Reviews come in many shapes and sizes: whimsical, academic, brief, long-winded; some are written very well, others not so much. What should be the protocol for shaping a review?
Think of what readers really need from a review. Regardless of the shape or size of the review, quite simply, readers want the facts. They want answers to questions. First and foremost, is it well-written? What's it about? To what genre does it belong? What style of writing does the author use? Who would enjoy reading the book? What lasting impressions does the book make? These last two questions do require a bit of subjectivity, but they are not an invitation for the reviewer to step up to the podium and lecture. It's this reviewer's opinion that reviews that do this invalidate the authenticity of the review.
Terri's recent post, Existentialist Themes in the Novel, In Leah's Wake, written in reaction to the review, states the matter quite clearly. With regard to her creation of In Leah's Wake, "A Catholic, I can no more escape my core beliefs or heritage than a Jewish, Muslim or atheist writer could his or hers."
Novel and author are part and parcel. Creating a novel is, in a sense, an author's platform for expression and thusly reflects their world view. I would argue that reviews are not platforms for reviewers. Scratching your head? Think of it this way. A book is an author's creation, complete with the full freedom of creative license; a review is a report on that author's effort, and while creative license certainly belongs to any writer, of reviews included, the reviewer should use some restraint.
While reviewers are readers too, a reviewer is so much more. A reviewer's role is to inform, not to emote or display their own world view. It is a reviewer's responsibility to provide an objective review, while making only enough of their personality known as to be deemed an opinion. Reactions that spill further become a different animal than "review". In other words, a reviewer should not turn a review into a soapbox for spouting their own belief system, socio-political orientation, personal plight, etc.
Maybe you enjoy hearing a reviewer bash a book, because it's too Republican, for example, or it doesn't sit well with them because it touches on divorce and they have just undergone one themselves. These factors may interest some readers, but because they don't aptly illustrate the author's work or the purpose of the book, do they really belong in a review? I would argue that there's a fine line between a reviewer's personal opinion of a book and their personal views on life. A reviewer should keep their personal viewpoints out of their review. In fact, the guidelines for some reviewer organizations require that the review not include one sentence written in the first person.
Reviewers come from all backgrounds, especially with the advent of the internet. This has opened the door to anyone with access to a keyboard. Reviews come in many shapes and sizes: whimsical, academic, brief, long-winded; some are written very well, others not so much. What should be the protocol for shaping a review?
Think of what readers really need from a review. Regardless of the shape or size of the review, quite simply, readers want the facts. They want answers to questions. First and foremost, is it well-written? What's it about? To what genre does it belong? What style of writing does the author use? Who would enjoy reading the book? What lasting impressions does the book make? These last two questions do require a bit of subjectivity, but they are not an invitation for the reviewer to step up to the podium and lecture. It's this reviewer's opinion that reviews that do this invalidate the authenticity of the review.
Labels:
Book Review,
Book Reviews
Bookmark this post:blogger tutorials
Social Bookmarking Blogger Widget |
| Reactions: |
Monday, October 17, 2011
#FF Looking to grow your followers?
Follow My Book Blog Friday helps you grow your followers. Hop on over to Parajunkee's Blog and join in.
Labels:
Blog Hop
Bookmark this post:blogger tutorials
Social Bookmarking Blogger Widget |
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Happily ever after? by Peter Murphy
What compells you to read fiction? Peter Murphy, author of Lagan Love, is guest posting today on the topic of fiction's purpose. Each of us do so for different reasons, but Peter's post will give you an inside look into the inner workings of his own literary yearnings as a writer.
Once upon a time many of the books I read ended with the tried and true assurance that: ‘they all lived happily ever after.’ For years I really wanted to believe it – that if you were good and nice that life would reward you. Conversely – if things went badly it was your own fault. I was raised in the Irish Catholic regime where guilt was encouraged and unworthiness was the birthright of Original Sin.
My early life was not always a rose garden. Far too often it was buffeted by the storms that erupted in those around me, and I looked to books for some reassurance, and I preferred those stories with strong morals and happy endings.
Since then, my views have changed.
But this remains an issue for anyone who would consider writing, because a great many people will expect their investment in reading a story be rewarded, and that reward must meet predetermined expectations. Never mind the idea that a good book could open doors and show things from a new perspective – when we consume we want guaranteed satisfaction. I understand that. We live in chaos and will grasp at anything that might help us deny that. I am convinced that too often we read to reinforce our convictions and shun opportunities to broaden or change our views.
That said there is nothing worse that struggling through the mental gyrations of some overly-complex work that cannot make up its mind what it is, but there has to be some middle ground in this and in all things.
For me, finding this is the role of good Fiction. It should entice us to take the opportunity to step out from all that we insulate ourselves with and wander through worlds that we would never visit physically. It should challenge us and it should make us different. But too often books are measured by their popularity rather than their effect.
And for many years books that were not popular simply vanished from the shelves – consigned to discount bins and dusty warehouses. Thankfully that is changing. One of the great advantages of ebooks is that there is no cost in keeping the book around until it finds a loving audience. This was the history of Jane Austen’s writing – her early sales were unspectacular but back then, Publishing was more elegant and committed to promoting Literature in all of its forms. Since then, like most human effort, it has become dominated by the instant gratification of immediate profit.
But with change comes challenge and I wonder which path I will take. The responses to my first novel, Lagan Love, have reinforced much of what I have said – some love it for the questions and reflections it provokes and others are uncomfortable with what confronts them in its pages.
Should I be brave and push on and out into all the Fiction can allow or should I find a niche and serve up the same fare over and over?
In the rest of my life I have made a career of saying that; ‘the Emperor has no clothes,’ so I doubt that will change too much but writers, just like the rest of us, do need to eat on a regular basis. But for now my second novel is shaping up much like the first and I look forward to the reactions it evokes. Perhaps, if the Gods and Fate are not offended, I might still have a chance at a ‘happily ever after!’
Peter Murphy was born in Killarney where he spent his first three years before his family was deported to Dublin, the Strumpet City. Growing up in the verdant braes of Templeogue, Peter was schooled by the De La Salle brothers in Churchtown where he played rugby for ‘The Wine and Gold’. He also played football (soccer) in secret!
After that, he graduated and studied the Humanities in Grogan’s under the guidance of Scot’s corner and the bar staff; Paddy, Tommy and Sean.
Murphy financed his education by working summers on the buildings sites of London in such places as Cricklewood, Camden Town and Kilburn.
Murphy also tramped the roads of Europe playing music and living without a care in the world. But his move to Canada changed all of that. He only came over for awhile – thirty years ago.
He took a day job and played music in the bars at night until the demands of family life intervened.
Having raised his children and packed them off to University, Murphy answered the long ignored internal voice and began to write.
He has no plans to make plans for the future and is happy to let things unfold as they do anyway.
Once upon a time many of the books I read ended with the tried and true assurance that: ‘they all lived happily ever after.’ For years I really wanted to believe it – that if you were good and nice that life would reward you. Conversely – if things went badly it was your own fault. I was raised in the Irish Catholic regime where guilt was encouraged and unworthiness was the birthright of Original Sin.
My early life was not always a rose garden. Far too often it was buffeted by the storms that erupted in those around me, and I looked to books for some reassurance, and I preferred those stories with strong morals and happy endings.
Since then, my views have changed.
But this remains an issue for anyone who would consider writing, because a great many people will expect their investment in reading a story be rewarded, and that reward must meet predetermined expectations. Never mind the idea that a good book could open doors and show things from a new perspective – when we consume we want guaranteed satisfaction. I understand that. We live in chaos and will grasp at anything that might help us deny that. I am convinced that too often we read to reinforce our convictions and shun opportunities to broaden or change our views.
That said there is nothing worse that struggling through the mental gyrations of some overly-complex work that cannot make up its mind what it is, but there has to be some middle ground in this and in all things.
For me, finding this is the role of good Fiction. It should entice us to take the opportunity to step out from all that we insulate ourselves with and wander through worlds that we would never visit physically. It should challenge us and it should make us different. But too often books are measured by their popularity rather than their effect.
And for many years books that were not popular simply vanished from the shelves – consigned to discount bins and dusty warehouses. Thankfully that is changing. One of the great advantages of ebooks is that there is no cost in keeping the book around until it finds a loving audience. This was the history of Jane Austen’s writing – her early sales were unspectacular but back then, Publishing was more elegant and committed to promoting Literature in all of its forms. Since then, like most human effort, it has become dominated by the instant gratification of immediate profit.
But with change comes challenge and I wonder which path I will take. The responses to my first novel, Lagan Love, have reinforced much of what I have said – some love it for the questions and reflections it provokes and others are uncomfortable with what confronts them in its pages.
Should I be brave and push on and out into all the Fiction can allow or should I find a niche and serve up the same fare over and over?
In the rest of my life I have made a career of saying that; ‘the Emperor has no clothes,’ so I doubt that will change too much but writers, just like the rest of us, do need to eat on a regular basis. But for now my second novel is shaping up much like the first and I look forward to the reactions it evokes. Perhaps, if the Gods and Fate are not offended, I might still have a chance at a ‘happily ever after!’
Peter Murphy was born in Killarney where he spent his first three years before his family was deported to Dublin, the Strumpet City. Growing up in the verdant braes of Templeogue, Peter was schooled by the De La Salle brothers in Churchtown where he played rugby for ‘The Wine and Gold’. He also played football (soccer) in secret!
After that, he graduated and studied the Humanities in Grogan’s under the guidance of Scot’s corner and the bar staff; Paddy, Tommy and Sean.
Murphy financed his education by working summers on the buildings sites of London in such places as Cricklewood, Camden Town and Kilburn.
Murphy also tramped the roads of Europe playing music and living without a care in the world. But his move to Canada changed all of that. He only came over for awhile – thirty years ago.
He took a day job and played music in the bars at night until the demands of family life intervened.
Having raised his children and packed them off to University, Murphy answered the long ignored internal voice and began to write.
He has no plans to make plans for the future and is happy to let things unfold as they do anyway.
LAGAN LOVE is Peter Murphy's novel.
You can visit his website at http://www.peterdamienmurphy.com/ or his blog at http://www.peterdamienmurphy.blogspot.com/. Connect with him at Twitter at www.twitter.com/PeeloMurphy and Facebook at www.facebook.com/LaganLove.
Labels:
Author Interview
Bookmark this post:blogger tutorials
Social Bookmarking Blogger Widget |
| Reactions: |
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Book Review: Our Haggadah: Uniting Traditions for Interfaith Families

Title: Our Haggadah: Uniting Traditions for Interfaith Families
Author: Cokie and Steve Roberts
Publisher: Harper Collins Publishers
ISBN, Pub. Date: 978-0-06-201810-6, Copyright 2011
Format: Hard Cover
Our Haggadah: Uniting Traditions for Interfaith Families is one family's step-by-step approach to performing the traditional Jewish Seder ritual for couples and families of mixed faiths. For those who are not familiar with the Seder, the tradition of this feast marks the beginning of Passover. As I read the book, however, I realized that the approach of the Robert's household had less to do with which prayer or wine to choose than it did with a greater message: that time-honored traditions, whether cultural or religious, can be adapted to provide common ground to all.
Cokie Roberts is both a New York Times best-selling author and journalist. She served as a senior news analyst for National Public Radio, where she was the congressional correspondent for more than ten years. In addition, she has been a political commentator for ABC News. Her husband, Steve Roberts, employed by the The New York Times as the paper's Washington, D.C. bureau chief, was also a senior writer at U.S. News & World Report for seven years where he is now a contributing editor. Roberts appears regularly on ABC Radio, Washington Week in Review, CNN, Hardball with Chris Matthews and often fills in as substitute host of The Diane Rehm Show on National Public Radio.
When the two met more than forty years ago, Cokie and Steve Roberts found common ground in their shared values, despite their different religious beliefs. Steve Roberts is Jewish. Cokie is of Catholic upbringing. Choosing to honor both of their faiths and traditions, they began hosting a Passover Seder that has evolved from a small family gathering to a veritable event celebrated with loved ones from all walks of life.
Based on the time-honored Haggadah—the text read throughout the evening that gives order to the ritual meal—Our Haggadah is a practical guide for interfaith families, whether they're celebrating their very first Passover or starting a new tradition. Originally composed on a typewriter and stapled together, Our Haggadah has been the Roberts family's handbook for each Seder and comes from years of adapting and expanding their Seders to welcome all who wish to take part in the celebration. From finding a Seder plate to preparing traditional and nontraditional foods, from the customary prayers to new ways for guests to participate, Cokie and Steve share their special approach to the holiday and the lessons they've learned over the years as an interfaith couple.
Everyone has their own views of how a seder should proceed, but for the Roberts the one-size-fits-all approach just didn't work. Cokie especially wanted to use the psalms that are also used in the Easter service. So they created their own Seder, here published after decades of editing from tried and true experiences with all the people who have attended their Seders, a variety friends, family and colleagues of many faiths and backgrounds.
The first part of the book consists of two essays by Cokie and Steven explaining the history of how the Seders developed. Coming from two very talented journalist, the touches of light humor make this a warm and personalized memoir. The next twenty pages provide instructions on how to prepare for a Seder and explains the symbols of the Seder (matza, etc). The rest of the book is a Haggadah one can use for their own Seder, or from which they can build, incorporating their own unique traditions.
This compact little book is beautifully illustrated by none other than one of my many talented Lutes cousins, Kristina Applegate Lutes. The essence of this book is exemplified in the words of "The Grace After Meals":
"Blessed be God of whose bounty we have eaten and by whose goodness we live. May God bless this home, the people at the table, and all of our loved ones who are not here with us tonight. May God bring peace to all homes, all nations, and all faith traditions."
I give this book a rating of five out of a possible five magic books. Any book that can unite people of different faiths is surely magic.
Disclaimer: I received a complimentary copy of Our Haggadah for review. No payment was received by me in exchange for this review nor was there an obligation to write a positive one. All opinions expressed here are entirely mine and may not necessarily agree with those of the author, the book's publisher and publicist or the readers of this review. This disclosure is in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.
Labels:
Book Review,
Book Reviews,
non-fiction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






